At 03:03 PM 10/24/02 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Creative Commons is working on a public domain dedication that we hope will satisfy those concerns. I don't think the legal defaults are right when it takes more effort to disclaim ownership than to assert it, but let's save that argument. Meanwhile here's hoping the Supreme Court tells us works must once again enter the public domain.Wendy Seltzer scripsit:> Unless an owner dedicates a work to the public domain, releasing all > exclusivity, One small point, not really relevant to the rest of your posting. There are people on this list who argue that you can't do that under the existing copyright regime: once in copyright, always in copyright until expiration (assuming we ever *have* a copyright expiration again, that is).
--Wendy
--
Wendy Seltzer -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: (212) 715-7815 // f: (212) 715-8192 // m: (914) 374-0613
Associate, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Adjunct Professor, St. John's University School of Law
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
