Richard Fontana wrote: >Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: >> As I recall it was withdrawn by CC before we were forced to consider >> whether its explicit removal of any implied patent protection was in >> fact a breach of the OSD. > >Yes, it was voluntarily withdrawn from consideration by Creative >Commons: >http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2012-February/000231.html
Leaving the question open whether this group would approve a new, non-duplicative license, which (let's say for sake of argument) does meet the OSD, but might not be a wise choice to use in the current legal climate. Andy Wilson Intel open source technology center _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
