Hi Albert, Gervase, Thanks for your continuing thoughts on the Illumina license issue. I don't have much to add to the discussion at this point, but I did want to let you know I was reading the posts, and will try to make use of the feedback to help us get illumina code out into the OSI community.
Thanks, Tamsen On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Albert Vilella <avile...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have been trying to wrap my head around the following license, and > discussed the contents of it with colleagues. There seems to be two > markedly opposed opinions around the license. This is, people that > think it's OSI-compliant, and people that think it's nothing close to > being OSI-compliant: > > > http://github.com/sequencing/isaac_aligner/blob/master/General_Illumina_Open_Source_License_Template_1_Final.pdf?raw=true > > Although I don't have anything against the license itself, I am > personally curious to see how it does when reviewed in this mailing > list. Specifically, I would like to see if there are any impediments > for software under this license to be packaged for Debian. > > Thanks in advance, > > Albert. > > Disclaimer: these thoughts and opinions are my own, and not that of my > employer. > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@opensource.org > http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
