hello, On 8 March 2012 00:04, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > James <pkx1...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 7 March 2012 23:42, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: >>> >>>> Well, "somebody" will likely be me, of course. Sleep is overrated. >>>> make check is not all that slow, and I can leave the full doc build to >>>> Patchy (assuming he is still on regular duty: there is actually no >>>> reason why he shouldn't be). That leaves the translations. Now we >>>> can reset them if needed, but I prefer not to do that since rewinding >>>> published history is a nuisance, and I don't really want to force the >>>> translators to mess more with their repositories than necessary. I >>>> suppose I'll push that thing shortly and hope for the best. >>> >>> I pushed both the translation branch as well as staging. The fixed >>> translation branch is merged into staging, but I have not merged staging >>> (hopefully master soon: I think midnight GMT is in 20 minutes, and that >>> should trigger James' patchy) back into translation. >>> >>> Translators should first check that lilypond/translation is in a >>> consistent state (I am doubtful about the committishes). Once it is >>> considered fine, one can merge the (hopefully) new master back, and the >>> two should be reasonably synced again. >> >> Do you still want me to keep patchy going? I'll pause it for now and >> if I hear nothing I'll kick it off. > > Huh? Why pause? I wrote "hopefully master soon". Just let the beast > run as scheduled.
OK it's off and running. I'll stick about for the next 20 minutes to see what happens. -- -- James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
