On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote: > > > So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick > > answer about this specific case? I guess the general consensus is > > "go ahead and we'll figure it out later". > > > > I *do* want this to work so well that it sets a solid precedent,
If this is going to set a precedent, then I will say "Do not submit LilyPond to LoMuS". I'm willing to go along with the current consensus only if there is the understanding that it does *not* set a precedent. > I get the sense in a way that the precedent has already been set - if someone > sees a cool opportunity (GSoC, LoMuS, whatever), email the list to call dibs > if dibs must be called, make sure no one is opposed, apply, and do something > fair with the money if money is to be gotten. In the GSoC case, Janek has > $500 that he'll be donating to the organization in whatever way he sees fit. That is not what happened. Google is paying Janek $4500 directly. Carl is getting $500 for the project, which I guess he will spend how he sees fit. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
