Hi, I noticed an oversight in \rest-by-number http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2966 resulting in a bad/wrong example in the NR.
What's the way to fix it: a) revert the patch or b) create a followup ? -Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
