2012/12/12 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> writes: > >> I noticed an oversight in \rest-by-number >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2966 >> resulting in a bad/wrong example in the NR. >> >> What's the way to fix it: >> a) revert the patch >> or >> b) create a followup >> ? > > If the oversight only affects uses of \rest-by-number and does not cause > compilation of either code or docs to abort, there is nothing gained by > reverting the patch. So it would appear a timely course of b) would be > appropriate. > > -- > David Kastrup
It's only the given, bad example. So I'll follow b) Thanks, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
