On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:30 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I suppose even better would be to come up with a way to automatically > > document public Scheme functions, but I wouldn't know how to do that > > at this point. > > Shouldn't actually be too hard. But I doubt that all functions with doc > strings would actually make sense in the internals manual. > > True. It could be something sloppy which is introduced with a warning to that effect. Functions might be organized by the source file. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
