On 2015/02/18 20:46:03, david.nalesnik wrote:
On 2015/02/18 19:32:57, david.nalesnik wrote: > Hmmm. Since this is no longer just a wrapper for Grob::name, I
suppose I
should > rewrite it in Scheme.
Not so sure now. Error reporting options in Scheme aren't as good.
I take that back. If I don't specifically meddle with the error message--as with grob::has-interface--I get what appear to be the same results. https://codereview.appspot.com/203090043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
