Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: > On 10.02.2017 00:19, Hans Åberg wrote: >> If LilyPond knows how to run the code via convert-ly, why does it not do it? > > LilyPond itself doesn’t change the code it is reading. convert-ly is a > separate Python script. > It might be a valid feature request, though, to have a command-line > option which makes LilyPond call convert-ly, if the \version statement > points to an older version, and then read the resulting code. > That would leave some things to be designed though, e.g. what would > happen if convert-ly issues ‘Not smart enough to update…’ – which > happens?
The problem is more that point-and-click and error messages no longer correspond to the actual source code. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
