2009/4/5 Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: > > Honestly, this would be OK with me. How many users are aware that > `c 4' is the same as `c4' (I wasn't, BTW)? Is this ever documented? > Do we have a single example which makes use of this syntactic > possibility?
Not that I know of (I wasn't aware either that you could do that...) Another solution would be to say that numbers-only entry is only possible after having used an explicite duration: e.g. c4 4 4 -> c4 c4 c4 but c4 c 4 -> c4 c4 This way we wouldn't break any existing code (but good luck for documenting that...) PS: besides, what's with you guys and this c4 obsession; have you been playing terrorist video games lately or what? :-) Regards, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
