Valentin Villenave wrote:
Another solution would be to say that numbers-only entry is only possible after having used an explicite duration: e.g. c4 4 4 -> c4 c4 c4 but c4 c 4 -> c4 c4 This way we wouldn't break any existing code (but good luck for documenting that...)
Ugly! Isn't this specific example a very good counter argument to introduce this feature (at least not without using a syntax like c4 &4 &4). /Mats _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
