On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:42:57PM -0500, Michael Lambert wrote:
> We've been experiencing a strange problem that is baffling our mail and
> network gurus. Our listserv server is hosted on a linux/390 RH 7.2
> image. Aside from some hiccups when the server was first built, listserv
> has just worked. Recently, however, I moved the listserv image from the
> RH 2.4.9-38 kernel to 2.4.19 with the IBM patches applied and moved from
> IUCV connections to a guestlan architecture.
>
> We immediately began seeing undelivered mail to a few specific sites
> pile up in the mqueue. Most of the listserv traffic was being delivered
> but a few sites returned connection refused or connection timed out.
> These sites, incidentally, also feature higher security then the others.

What do you mean by "higher security"? What hosts do recieve messages?
What hosts don't?

> The DNS servers at our site and at the recipient's sites both had the
> correct info, so it doesn't appear to be a lookup issue. Sending mail
> manually from the command line (and telnetting to 25) also elicited the
> same responses. We moved listserv back to the IUCV connection and
> original ip but the behavior remained the same.
>
> In the course of testing, we found that some RH 9 boxes that we have
> also refuse to take any mail from the server. A quick glance at the logs
> and sniff of the traffic shows that the connection is rejected before
> any mail negotiation takes place, as if the packets are malformed or
> unacceptable in some way. We can traceroute and ping successfully,
> however.

Can you use any other tcp services? e.g: a simple http server?

>
> Does this ring any bells for anyone? I would backlevel the server to
> 2.4.9-38 (although I'm not convinced that the kernel is the problem),
> but I can't seem to find the rpm any longer.

Is there any issue of IP address change and relay? Some hosts expect
that mail should come only from specific IPs?

--
Tzafrir Cohen                       +---------------------------+
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/ |vim is a mutt's best friend|
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]       +---------------------------+

Reply via email to