On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 15:37 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > Looking at this, people say, "This is good, but it's kind of a mess at the > moment. Can we get some sort of 'canonical list of extensions' or > /something/ stable for devs to work from?" To which Dave replies, "FUD! > FUD! FUD! Such a list accomplishes nothing!"
Actually I specifically said making a list of "well supported" extensions was a good idea. Making a bunch of different "categories" of LV2 support is stupid, and claiming the extension thing is some apocalyptic disaster with no evidence is FUD. > Dave *seems* to think that "The > Problem" isn't a problem. Dave is, at this moment, working on "The Problem" (documentation). Actions speak louder than words. -dr _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
