On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 23:09 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 12:52:52PM -0500, David Robillard wrote: > > > This wouldn't be an LV2 plugin at all. > > In spirit, no. But technically it would be a > perfectly conforming plugin.
Huh? An LV2 plugin in the code sense is a shared library with a lv2_descriptor function that returns a struct LV2_Descriptor (just like LADSPA). I don't see how a shared library with some random C++ object in it is an LV2 plugin... or what the point would be anyway -dr _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
