cal wrote: > In considering a rand() -> random() -> random_r() transition, is the > random_r() > family considered "cool for school"? Or are they simply not worth the bother > given the srandom_r() segfault (easily resolved) and a "non-standard glibc > extensions" tag.
You didn't say what you're using the random numbers for. Even crappy old rand() would possibly be ok for some applications and completely useless for others. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
