On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, cal wrote:
>> That is to say, if you need a reproduceable string of "random" numbers >> on each thread (e.g. for unit testing), then random_r() is your man. >> Otherwise, it sounds like more trouble than it's worth. > As I understand it, zyn wants a reproducible sequence for mainstream, > plus a reproducible per note sequence seeded according to the current > point in the mainstream sequence. Interrupting and resuming the > mainstream sequence was the issue I was looking to simplify. If you step > over srandom_r(), it's really not any great trouble. Kind of like where the random number generator is part of the envelope, huh? That makes sense... in which case random_r() would be a good use for that. -gabriel _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
