On 26-02-2020 22:51, rosea.grammostola wrote: >> That is an interesting trend isn't it? Certainly the presets are much >> more convenient to use right from rakarrack than using the plugins. I >> had hoped my project would be used more, but OTOH I use them and I >> don't regret the effort. > It's interesting for sure... > > Imho working with all the JACK applications can be a pain on Linux, but > with nsm support, the experience is much better. And then standalone > applications are preferable in certain situations actually. If I would > need one instance of Zynaddsubfx, I would always grab the standalone > version. If I need more instances, I might switch to Carla instead and > grab the plugin. > > On the other hand, I know people are using Rakarrack, because you can > launch multiple instances and chain them together to create something > interesting.
Actually I always thought doing automation with JACK standalone applications was a huge disadvantage compared with plugins. But it's actually good possible to sent midi cc automation from a DAW to a JACK standalone softsynth like Zynaddsubfx. Or I was ignorant, or I'm still ignorant, but I don't see the problem not so much anymore. :) By the way, I've heard people are using your plugins too, so don't worry too much about it. ;)
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
