Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2007 15:03:55 schrieb Christophe Thommeret: > Le jeudi 19 juillet 2007 16:26, Uwe Bugla a écrit : > > > > > (The main difference between dvbscan and kaffeine is that kaffeine > > > > > filters one pid at a time (+ the nit pid in a second thread) while > > > > > dvbscan creates up to 32 (iirc), so dvbscan is a bit faster, but > > > > > maybe your device/driver doesn't like it.) > > > > > > > > 1. That sounds VERY interesting! so please WHERE in scan's source > > > > code can I reduce the pid filtering to ONE PID and how. I do not call > > > > myself a programmer, so can you please give me a hint where I can > > > > find the appropriate sections in latest "scan.c" to patch that thing? > > > > It indeed would save me a lot of pain if I only knew where to look at > > > > and what to patch! :) > > try to decrease MAX_RUNNING in scan.c > > (btw, something may be wrong with your mail reader, as you see your > response was double quoted.)
Thank you for that hint, Christophe. :) Reducing "define MAX_RUNNING=1" instead of 27 in fact slows down the whole process, but the real problem unfortunately stays. In fact I have tried a couple of numbers: 1, 2, 10, 20...... 7 walkthroughs - 7 different scan results. :( WHERE the timeouts happen is highly "by chance". :( There are channels missing in one walkthrough that appear in another and so on....... The scan result you can never call "standardized" or equal, as the number of dumped services is never at least close to equal. :( Kaffeine's scan result appears far more confidential than the one of "scan". Any other hints from your part where I could poke around in scan.c to resolve that issue??? Would be a pleasure! :) Best regards Uwe _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
