>>> Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> schrieb am 29.10.2014 um 10:49 in Nachricht <20141029094927.GA32415@walrus.homenet>: [...] > Even though nodes may have ids different from their names, people > are prone to reference them by name and not by some number such > as 167906357. Well, we can't really blame them, can we. So, > the node uname is effectively its name, for all intents and > purposes. The fact that some programs need an unwieldy number to > reference nodes do not change our perspective. > >> This also breaks syntax of some existing commands, as Dejan >> says, f.e. > > It doesn't break the syntax, it just makes it impossible to > reference CIB elements. If you have a node named xyz and then > also a resource named xyz, how should a stupid program such as > crmsh know what do you mean when you say "xyz"... >
I wonder whether "prefix tags" could help here: When names are not unique in a context the user could use the prefix "host:name" to mean the host named "name" and "rsc:r" to mean resource "r" (Or a tag with la less ugly, but longer name). Isn't a similar mechnism already used wthen specify ing the RA? Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
