>>> "MOULLE, ALAIN" <alain.mou...@atos.net> schrieb am 21.08.2015 um 15:27 in
Nachricht
<df84cff8a85ab546b2d53fff12267727022...@frauvj99ex5msx.ww931.my-it-solutions.net

:
> Hi
> 
> I can't find a way to configure constraints in pacemaker so that with these

> resources:
> 
> Res1
> Res2
> Res3
> Res4
> Res5
> 
> with current colocation constraints :
> Res2 with Res1
> Res3 with Res2

I think pacemaker still cannot do transitive location constraints; can you
try
R2 with R1
R3 with R1
(and related) instead?

> 
> Res4 with Res1
> Res5 with Res4
> 
> and current order symmetrical constraints :
> Res2 after Res1
> Res3 after Res2
> 
> Res4 after Res1
> Res5 after Res4
> 
> and migration-threshold=1 on all resources .
> 
> What I want it that if I have a failure for example on Res3  is that all the

> 5 Ressources are migrated.
> 
> Is there a solution ?
> 
> For example , with an HA LVM configuration and VM resources :
> 
> Res1=VGA
> Res2=FS-img-VM1 (where are the VM1 image and .xml) (FS-img-VM1 is on VGA
LV)
> Res3=VM1
> Res4=FS-img-VM2 (where are the VM2 image and .xml) (FS-img-VM1 is on another
VGA 
> LV)
> Res5=VM2
> 
> So current constraints are so that VGA is activated before the FS-img is 
> mounted and before the VM is started.
> 
> But I want that if the VM1 fails, it can migrate on another node (together 
> with all other 4 resources) but with only the constraints above, the VGA 
> stalls the migration of the VM ...
> 
> Is there any solution by constraints configuration ?
> Note : we can't use group resources for now, because VMs are remote-nodes.
> 
> Thanks
> Alain Moullé
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list is closing down.
> Please subscribe to us...@clusterlabs.org instead.
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org 
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 



_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list is closing down.
Please subscribe to us...@clusterlabs.org instead.
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha

Reply via email to