On 2016/10/15 3:37, John Youn wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 4:36 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> From: Chen Yu <cheny...@huawei.com>
>>
>> The Hi6220's usb controller is limited in that it does not
>> automatically autonegotiate the usb speed. Thus it requires a
>> quirk so that we can manually negotiate the best usb speed for
>> the attached device.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Could you expand more on this by explaining what exactly is the
> limitation and the workaround?
> 

The USB host limitation of Hisilicon Hi6220 is full-speed and low-speed
devices can not be enumerated when gets plugged behind a hub.

> [snip]
> 
>> +/*
>> + * HPRT0_SPD_HIGH_SPEED: high speed
>> + * HPRT0_SPD_FULL_SPEED: full speed
>> + */
>> +static void dwc2_change_bus_speed(struct usb_hcd *hcd, int speed)
>> +{
>> +    struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg = dwc2_hcd_to_hsotg(hcd);
>> +
>> +    if (hsotg->core_params->speed == speed)
>> +            return;
>> +
>> +    hsotg->core_params->speed = speed;
>> +    queue_work(hsotg->wq_otg, &hsotg->wf_otg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dwc2_alloc_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
>> +{
>> +    struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg = dwc2_hcd_to_hsotg(hcd);
>> +
>> +    if (!hsotg->change_speed_quirk)
>> +            return 1;
>> +
>> +    hsotg->device_count++;
> 
> Why do you need to track the device count?
> 
>> +    dev_info(hsotg->dev, "Device count is %u after alloc dev\n",
>> +                    hsotg->device_count);
>> +
>> +    return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dwc2_free_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
>> +{
>> +    struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg = dwc2_hcd_to_hsotg(hcd);
>> +
>> +    if (!hsotg->change_speed_quirk)
>> +            return;
>> +
>> +    if (hsotg->device_count)
>> +            hsotg->device_count--;
>> +
>> +    dev_info(hsotg->dev, "Device count is %u after free dev\n",
>> +                    hsotg->device_count);
>> +
>> +    if (hsotg->device_count == 1 && udev->parent &&
>> +                    udev->parent->speed > USB_SPEED_UNKNOWN &&
>> +                    udev->parent->speed < USB_SPEED_HIGH) {
>> +            dev_info(hsotg->dev, "Set speed to default high-speed\n");
>> +            dwc2_change_bus_speed(hcd, HPRT0_SPD_HIGH_SPEED);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dwc2_reset_device(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
>> +{
>> +    struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg = dwc2_hcd_to_hsotg(hcd);
>> +
>> +    if (!hsotg->change_speed_quirk)
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>> +    if (udev->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH) {
>> +            dev_info(hsotg->dev, "Set speed to high-speed\n");
>> +            dwc2_change_bus_speed(hcd, HPRT0_SPD_HIGH_SPEED);
>> +    } else if (udev->speed == USB_SPEED_FULL
>> +                    || udev->speed == USB_SPEED_LOW) {
>> +            dev_info(hsotg->dev, "Set speed to full-speed\n");
>> +            dwc2_change_bus_speed(hcd, HPRT0_SPD_FULL_SPEED);
>> +    }
> 
> It seems you are reinitializing the core every time a device is reset
> and the udev->speed does not match the core_param speed. But how is
> the udev->speed being set correctly if the hw cannot negotiate the
> speed in the first place?
> 

The hardware can negotiate the speed, but communication with a full-speed or
low-speed device behind a hub is the problem.

> Also should it be for every device? What about if a device gets
> plugged in behind a hub? I don't think you want to execute this code
> in that case.
> 
> This should only affect devices plugged into the root hub, correct?
> And the hsotg controller only has one root hub port. It seems things
> could be simplified a bit.
> 

The patch is initially written for Hikey Hi6220 board, and there is a
hub always connected to root hub, so the patch sets the configuration to
HPRT0_SPD_HIGH_SPEED when there is only one device(the hub).

Thanks for your suggestions, the patch needs modified in these aspect:
1. Change the speed setting only when the device is behind a hub in 
dwc2_reset_device.
2. Change the speed to HPRT0_SPD_HIGH_SPEED only when the last device is a hub.

What do you think about the fix? Any suggestions will be appreciate!

thanks
- Chen Yu

Reply via email to