On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:36:35AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 14:05 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > The thing is others and I (and you) are working on getting paravirt_ops > > > working for x86_64. There's a lot of overlap between i386 and x86_64. > > > Right now the i386 is ahead of x86_64 and the code seems to be put more > > > in the arch/i386 arch. So now we are going to introduce a > > > new ../../i386 hack to get to a shared paravirt_shared.c(?). Or do we > > > > What would you like exactly to share? > > I'm still working on that. Others have pressured us into consolidating > as much usable code for i386 into x86_64. This may turn out not to be > too feasible anyway.
Only do it where it makes sense and is not too intrusive. Redoing the whole port just for lguest64 is probably not a good idea. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
