On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:24:04AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org>
> 
> Set up virutal EL2 context to hardware if the guest exception level is
> EL2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jint...@cs.columbia.edu>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/context.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> index 320afc6..acb4b1e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> @@ -25,10 +25,25 @@
>  void kvm_arm_setup_shadow_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>       struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
> +     if (unlikely(vcpu_mode_el2(vcpu))) {
> +             ctxt->hw_pstate = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & ~PSR_MODE_MASK;
>  
> -     ctxt->hw_pstate = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
> -     ctxt->hw_sys_regs = ctxt->sys_regs;
> -     ctxt->hw_sp_el1 = ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1;
> +             /*
> +              * We emulate virtual EL2 mode in hardware EL1 mode using the
> +              * same stack pointer mode as the guest expects.
> +              */

I think this comment should either be deleted or explain why this works
as opposed to stating the obvious.  How about:

                /*
                 * We can emulate the guest's configuration of which
                 * stack pointer to use when executing in virtual EL2 by
                 * using the equivalent feature in EL1 to point to
                 * either the EL1 or EL0 stack pointer.
                 */

> +             if ((*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & PSR_MODE_MASK) == PSR_MODE_EL2h)
> +                     ctxt->hw_pstate |= PSR_MODE_EL1h;
> +             else
> +                     ctxt->hw_pstate |= PSR_MODE_EL1t;
> +
> +             ctxt->hw_sys_regs = ctxt->shadow_sys_regs;
> +             ctxt->hw_sp_el1 = ctxt->el2_regs[SP_EL2];
> +     } else {
> +             ctxt->hw_pstate = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
> +             ctxt->hw_sys_regs = ctxt->sys_regs;
> +             ctxt->hw_sp_el1 = ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1;
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -38,9 +53,14 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_shadow_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  void kvm_arm_restore_shadow_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>       struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
> -
> -     *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = ctxt->hw_pstate;
> -     ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1 = ctxt->hw_sp_el1;
> +     if (unlikely(vcpu_mode_el2(vcpu))) {
> +             *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= PSR_MODE_MASK;
> +             *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= ctxt->hw_pstate & ~PSR_MODE_MASK;
> +             ctxt->el2_regs[SP_EL2] = ctxt->hw_sp_el1;
> +     } else {
> +             *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = ctxt->hw_pstate;
> +             ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1 = ctxt->hw_sp_el1;
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  void kvm_arm_init_cpu_context(kvm_cpu_context_t *cpu_ctxt)
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 

Reply via email to