* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ Ok, I think it's those timers again...
agreed - this seems to be a genuine CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y bug. (which has probably not been fixed since -rc4 either, we have no bugfix in this area that could explain the expires_next==KTIME_MAX timer state visible in SysRq-Q.) there seems to be a trend in the reports: HT P4 CPUs. > Ingo: let me just state how *happy* I am that I told you off when > you wanted to merge the hires timers and NO_HZ before 2.6.20 because > they were "stable". You were wrong, and 2.6.20 is at least in > reasonable shape. [...] yes - i was quite wrong pushing it so hard. (and doubly so given your stated focus of making v2.6.20 a quiet release) Sorry :-/ > [...] Now we just need to make sure that 2.6.21 will be too.. ] yeah - we are working hard on it. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/