On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:00:05 +0900
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On (03/24/17 12:39), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [..]
> > Is there a stack trace of where the lockdep dump happened? That is
> > useful too. Otherwise we don't see where the inverse happened.  
> 
> Steven, isn't it the inversion I describe in [1] (after the first lockdep
> warning)?
> 
> [1] lkml.kernel.org/r/20170321044421.GB448@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain
>

Yeah, I believe you are right. I just wanted to make sure. It's the
same backtrace as the "(&(&sclp_con_lock)->rlock){-.-...}:" dump, but I
wanted to make sure.

-- Steve

Reply via email to