On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:40:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 08:08:09AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > And even that would not be completely sufficient. After all, the state
> > in the leaf rcu_node structure will be out of date during grace-period
> > initialization and cleanup. So to -completely- synchronize state for
> > the incoming CPU, I would have to acquire the root rcu_node structure's
> > lock and look at the live state. Needless to say, the performance and
> > scalability implications of acquiring a global lock on each and every
> > idle exit event is not going to be at all pretty.
>
> Arguably you could use a seqlock to read the global state. Will still
> ponder things a bit more, esp. those bugs you pointed me at from just
> reading gpnum.
Looking forward to hearing what you come up with!
Thanx, Paul
