On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:51:01AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> I was following the existing practice exemplified by
> bioset_create_nobvec().

Which is pretty ugly to start with..

> By not changing the signature of the function, I can avoid touching
> quite a few places where it is called.

There are 13 callers of bioset_create and one caller of
bioset_create_nobvec, and your series touches many of those.

So just adding a flags argument to bioset_create and passing
BIOSET_NEED_BVECS and BIOSET_NEED_RESUER flags to it doesn't seem
to much of an effort, and it's going to create a much nicer and easier
to extend interface.

Reply via email to