Is there any particular reason that the CVE appears to be filed against 4.4.60? Or is this just a mistake?
http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2016-10229/ - Steven On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:09:53PM -0700, Steven Pease wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is my first post - not currently subscribed so please CC me. :) I >> searched a bit for this question, but couldn't find an answer (Googled >> '2016-10229 site:lkml.org'). >> >> Does CVE-2016-10229 affect the newest version of the 4.4.x kernel >> series (currently 4.4.68) and are there any plans to fix this in the >> 4.4 kernel series? > > This one was fixed by upstream commit 197c949 ("udp: properly support > MSG_PEEK with truncated buffers"), which was backported in 4.4 as > commit dfe2042d96 in 4.4.21. So in short, 4.4.68 is safe. > > Willy -- - Steven