On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de> > > ... and save us the splrinking of this test around in the callers. > > No functionality change. > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de> > --- > drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxface.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxface.c > index 010b1c43df92..881b0d5b2838 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxface.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxface.c > @@ -226,6 +226,9 @@ acpi_get_table_header(char *signature, > u32 j; > struct acpi_table_header *header; > > + if (acpi_disabled) > + return (AE_ERROR); > + > /* Parameter validation */ > > if (!signature || !out_table_header) { > --
Is acpi_disabled an ACPICA variable? If not, this cannot go upstream. Not a big deal I guess, but somewhat yucky.