Re: lseek patch for 2.2.18pre23

[kernel]

On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> And in LFS (that means also 2.4.x) the >> 32 doesn't make any sense in lseek
> and should be removed:

Actually, the >> 32 part was there to avoid doing the long long comparison
on x86.  Granted, that probably doesn't matter.

                -ben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/