lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr...@gmail.com>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johan...@canonical.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmor...@namei.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <se...@hallyn.com>
Cc: <linux-security-mod...@vger.kernel.org>
---
security/apparmor/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/apparmor/file.c b/security/apparmor/file.c
index 4285943f7260..d0afed9ebd0e 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/file.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/file.c
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static void update_file_ctx(struct aa_file_ctx *fctx,
struct aa_label *label,
/* update caching of label on file_ctx */
spin_lock(&fctx->lock);
old = rcu_dereference_protected(fctx->label,
- spin_is_locked(&fctx->lock));
+ lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
l = aa_label_merge(old, label, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (l) {
if (l != old) {
--
2.19.0
