On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:46:28AM +0000, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06.02.2019 10:13, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:18:04PM +0100, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote:
> >> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.bez...@microchip.com>
> >>
> >> SAM9X60 uses high and low drive strengths. To implement this, in
> >> at91_pinctrl_mux_ops::set_drivestrength and
> >> at91_pinctrl_mux_ops::get_drivestrength we need bit numbers of
> >> drive strengths (1 for low, 2 for high), thus change the code to
> >> allow the usage of drive strength bit numbers.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.bez...@microchip.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c 
> >> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> >> index 3d49bbbcdbc7..31f06dafca2e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> >> @@ -72,10 +72,15 @@ static int gpio_banks;
> >>   * DRIVE_STRENGTH_DEFAULT is just a placeholder to avoid changing the 
> >> drive
> >>   * strength when there is no dt config for it.
> >>   */
> >> -#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_DEFAULT            (0 << DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
> >> -#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_LOW          (1 << DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
> >> -#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_MED          (2 << DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
> >> -#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI           (3 << DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
> >> +enum drive_strength_bit {
> >> +  DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_DEF,
> >> +  DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_LOW,
> >> +  DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MED,
> >> +  DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_HI,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(name)      (DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_##name << \
> >> +                                   DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
> >>  
> >>  /**
> >>   * struct at91_pmx_func - describes AT91 pinmux functions
> >> @@ -551,7 +556,7 @@ static unsigned 
> >> at91_mux_sama5d3_get_drivestrength(void __iomem *pio,
> >>    /* SAMA5 strength is 1:1 with our defines,
> >>     * except 0 is equivalent to low per datasheet */
> >>    if (!tmp)
> >> -          tmp = DRIVE_STRENGTH_LOW;
> >> +          tmp = DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(LOW);
> >>  
> >>    return tmp;
> >>  }
> >> @@ -564,7 +569,7 @@ static unsigned at91_mux_sam9x5_get_drivestrength(void 
> >> __iomem *pio,
> >>  
> >>    /* strength is inverse in SAM9x5s hardware with the pinctrl defines
> >>     * hardware: 0 = hi, 1 = med, 2 = low, 3 = rsvd */
> >> -  tmp = DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI - tmp;
> >> +  tmp = DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(HI) - tmp;
> >>  
> >>    return tmp;
> >>  }
> >> @@ -600,7 +605,7 @@ static void at91_mux_sam9x5_set_drivestrength(void 
> >> __iomem *pio, unsigned pin,
> >>  
> >>    /* strength is inverse on SAM9x5s with our defines
> >>     * 0 = hi, 1 = med, 2 = low, 3 = rsvd */
> >> -  setting = DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI - setting;
> >> +  setting = DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(HI) - setting;
> >>  
> >>    set_drive_strength(pio + at91sam9x5_get_drive_register(pin), pin,
> >>                            setting);
> >> @@ -959,11 +964,11 @@ static int at91_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev 
> >> *pctldev,
> >>    }                                       \
> >>  } while (0)
> >>  
> >> -#define DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(mask,flag) do {      \
> >> +#define DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(mask,flag,name) do { \
> > 
> > checkpatch error: space required
> 
> I'm aware of that but I added it in the way it was previously (were the
> checkpatch error was still present). Please let me know if you want me to
> send a new version fixing this.

I think it's the opportunity to fix it. If you can resend a new version
including my ack.

Regards

Ludovic

> 
> Thank you,
> Claudiu Beznea
> 
> > 
> >>    if ((config & mask) == flag) {          \
> >>            if (num_conf)                   \
> >>                    seq_puts(s, "|");       \
> >> -          seq_puts(s, #flag);             \
> >> +          seq_puts(s, #name);             \
> >>            num_conf++;                     \
> >>    }                                       \
> >>  } while (0)
> >> @@ -981,9 +986,12 @@ static void at91_pinconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev 
> >> *pctldev,
> >>    DBG_SHOW_FLAG(PULL_DOWN);
> >>    DBG_SHOW_FLAG(DIS_SCHMIT);
> >>    DBG_SHOW_FLAG(DEGLITCH);
> >> -  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_LOW);
> >> -  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_MED);
> >> -  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI);
> >> +  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(LOW),
> >> +                       DRIVE_STRENGTH_LOW);
> >> +  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(MED),
> >> +                       DRIVE_STRENGTH_MED);
> >> +  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(HI),
> >> +                       DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI);
> >>    DBG_SHOW_FLAG(DEBOUNCE);
> >>    if (config & DEBOUNCE) {
> >>            val = config >> DEBOUNCE_VAL_SHIFT;
> >> -- 
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Reply via email to