On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This still doesn't tell "sync()" about dirty pages (ie the "innd loses the
> active file after a reboot" bug), but now the places that mark pages dirty
> are under control. Next step..
Do you really want to split the per-address-space pages list in dirty and
clean lists for 2.4 ?
Or do you think walking the current per-address-space page list searching
for dirty pages and syncing them is ok?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
