Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, pre-5 should have all the same places you found already fixed, but > please do give it some heavy-duty testing to make sure there isn't > anything hidden.. I've beaten on it fairly heavily with the BUG in there as you suggested, with no problems. This kernel even seems a little faster: Test machine: 64 meg, 500 Mhz K6, IDE, Ext2, Blocksize=4K Test: dbench 48 pre4 9.5 MB/sec 11 min 6 secs pre5 10.8 MB/sec 9 min 48 secs I think it would be an awfully good idea to let the BUG out for mass consumption: + if (PageDirty(page)) BUG(); remove_page_from_inode_queue(page); remove_page_from_hash_queue(page); page->mapping = NULL; -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Zlatko Calusic
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Dan Aloni
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Zlatko Calusic
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Philipp Rumpf
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Chris Mason
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Chris Mason
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds