On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a > problem then how about the patch below?
I don't think it is. > -NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK) > +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel/CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK) > P: Paul Moore > M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +W: http://netlabel.sf.net (NetLabel/CIPSO) > L: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > S: Maintained My preference would be for something like: NETLABEL and CIPSO P: Paul Moore M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://netlabel.sf.net L: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S: Maintained F: Documentation/netlabel/ F: include/net/netlabel.h F: net/netlabel/ Labeled IPsec and SECMARK P: Paul Moore M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] L: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S: Supported F: include/linux/netfilter/*SECMARK* F: net/netfilter/*SECMARK* I would like to add appropriate file patterns for each block. Also, I'm not sure of the Supported/Maintained status of each block. The distinction is supposed to be: Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this. Maintained: Someone actually looks after it. Could you please clarify those for me? cheers, Joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
