On 10/20/19 7:16 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> … But after this release the the return statement
>> tries to access the label field of the rule which results in
>> use-after-free. Before releaseing the rule, copy errNo and return it
>> after releasing rule.
> 
Navid thanks for finding this, and Markus thanks for the review

> Please avoid a duplicate word and a typo in this change description.
> My preference would be a v2 version of the patch with the small clean-ups
that Markus has pointed out.

If I don't see a v2 this week I can pull this one in and do the revisions
myself adding a little fix-up note.

> 
> …
>> +++ b/security/apparmor/audit.c
> …
>> @@ -197,8 +198,9 @@ int aa_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, 
>> void **vrule)
>>      rule->label = aa_label_parse(&root_ns->unconfined->label, rulestr,
>>                                   GFP_KERNEL, true, false);
>>      if (IS_ERR(rule->label)) {
>> +            err = rule->label;
> 
> How do you think about to define the added local variable in this if branch 
> directly?
> 
> +             int err = rule->label;
> 

yes, since err isn't defined or in use else where this would be preferable

>>              aa_audit_rule_free(rule);
>> -            return PTR_ERR(rule->label);
>> +            return PTR_ERR(err);
>>      }
>>
>>      *vrule = rule;
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> 

Reply via email to