On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:20:53PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > +static int tja11xx_config_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > +{
> > +   u16 ctl = 0;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   switch (phydev->master_slave_set) {
> > +   case PORT_MODE_CFG_MASTER_FORCE:
> > +   case PORT_MODE_CFG_MASTER_PREFERRED:
> > +           ctl |= MII_CFG1_MASTER_SLAVE;
> > +           break;
> > +   case PORT_MODE_CFG_SLAVE_FORCE:
> > +   case PORT_MODE_CFG_SLAVE_PREFERRED:
> > +           break;
> > +   case PORT_MODE_CFG_UNKNOWN:
> > +           return 0;
> > +   default:
> > +           phydev_warn(phydev, "Unsupported Master/Slave mode\n");
> > +           return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +   }
> 
> Does the hardware actually support PORT_MODE_CFG_SLAVE_PREFERRED and
> PORT_MODE_CFG_MASTER_PREFERRED? I thought that required autoneg, which
> this PHY does not support? So i would of expected these two values to
> return ENOTSUPP?

I do not have strong opinion here. Will change it.

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to