On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:29:41PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.09.20 15:39, Qian Cai wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 08:59 +0800, Huang Ying wrote: > >> static int apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type > >> zone) > >> @@ -2474,11 +2481,13 @@ int mpol_misplaced(struct page *page, struct > >> vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long > >> int thisnid = cpu_to_node(thiscpu); > >> int polnid = NUMA_NO_NODE; > >> int ret = -1; > >> + bool moron; > > > > Are you really going to use that name those days? > > > > > > include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h:#define MPOL_F_MORON (1 << 4) /* > Migrate On protnone Reference On Node */ > > Not commenting the decision for that name. It's uapi ... and naming the > variable like the uapi flag seems to be a sane thing to do ... hmmm ...
Perhaps we could migrate to mopron / MPOL_F_MOPRON?
