On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:00:50AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:45:56PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > > Yes, that would make sense. It would bring sysfs back to feature > > parity with the ioctls. > > Which is a good thing?
Yes, of course it is. I'm sorry I didn't insist on it in the first place! > Anyway, Christian, if you do decide to do that, here's some context why > I didn't do it when I added the additional knobs for periodic output: > https://www.mail-archive.com/linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04150.html I think Christian is proposing a different sysfs file, not a flag in the existing ones. That makes sense to me. Thanks, Richard
