On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 10:01 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > For the patches, there is a mutex_lock in kn->attr_mutex, as Tejun > > mentioned here > > (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/x8fe0cmu+aq1g...@mtj.duckdns.org/), > > maybe a global > > rwsem for kn->iattr will be better?? > > I wasn't sure about that, IIRC a spin lock could be used around the > initial check and checked again at the end which would probably have > been much faster but much less conservative and a bit more ugly so > I just went the conservative path since there was so much change > already.
Sorry, I hadn't looked at Tejun's reply yet and TBH didn't remember it. Based on what Tejun said it sounds like that needs work. Ian
