Hi Fabrizio, Rob,

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:53 PM Fabrizio Castro
<fabrizio.castro...@renesas.com> wrote:
> Convert the Renesas DRIF bindings to DT schema and update
> MAINTAINERS accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro...@renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad...@bp.renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,drif.yaml

> +  clock-names:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    items:
> +      - const: fck

With latest dt-schema, "make dt_binding_check" complains:

    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,drif.yaml:
properties:clock-names:maxItems: False schema does not allow 1
    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,drif.yaml:
ignoring, error in schema: properties: clock-names: maxItems

Using

       clock-names:
         const: fck

Fixes that.

However, I'm wondering why I do not get a complaint about the similar
clock/clock-names in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/renesas,lvds.yaml.
Because they're part of an else branch?

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to