On 2/3/21 2:00 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
Rather than decrementing the head page refcount one by one, we
walk the page array and checking which belong to the same
compound_head. Later on we decrement the calculated amount
of references in a single write to the head page. To that
end switch to for_each_compound_head() does most of the work.

set_page_dirty() needs no adjustment as it's a nop for
non-dirty head pages and it doesn't operate on tail pages.

This considerably improves unpinning of pages with THP and
hugetlbfs:

- THP
gup_test -t -m 16384 -r 10 [-L|-a] -S -n 512 -w
PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK (put values): ~87.6k us -> ~23.2k us

- 16G with 1G huge page size
gup_test -f /mnt/huge/file -m 16384 -r 10 [-L|-a] -S -n 512 -w
PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK: (put values): ~87.6k us -> ~27.5k us

Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>
---
  mm/gup.c | 29 +++++++++++------------------
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 4f88dcef39f2..971a24b4b73f 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -270,20 +270,15 @@ void unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, 
unsigned long npages,
                                 bool make_dirty)
  {
        unsigned long index;
-
-       /*
-        * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is
-        * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a
-        * single operation to the head page should suffice.
-        */

Great to see this TODO (and the related one below) finally done!

Everything looks correct here.

Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>


thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

+       struct page *head;
+       unsigned int ntails;
if (!make_dirty) {
                unpin_user_pages(pages, npages);
                return;
        }
- for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
-               struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
+       for_each_compound_head(index, pages, npages, head, ntails) {
                /*
                 * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
                 * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key
@@ -304,9 +299,9 @@ void unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, 
unsigned long npages,
                 * written back, so it gets written back again in the
                 * next writeback cycle. This is harmless.
                 */
-               if (!PageDirty(page))
-                       set_page_dirty_lock(page);
-               unpin_user_page(page);
+               if (!PageDirty(head))
+                       set_page_dirty_lock(head);
+               put_compound_head(head, ntails, FOLL_PIN);
        }
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock);
@@ -323,6 +318,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock);
  void unpin_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
  {
        unsigned long index;
+       struct page *head;
+       unsigned int ntails;
/*
         * If this WARN_ON() fires, then the system *might* be leaking pages (by
@@ -331,13 +328,9 @@ void unpin_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long 
npages)
         */
        if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR_VALUE(npages)))
                return;
-       /*
-        * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is
-        * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a
-        * single operation to the head page should suffice.
-        */
-       for (index = 0; index < npages; index++)
-               unpin_user_page(pages[index]);
+
+       for_each_compound_head(index, pages, npages, head, ntails)
+               put_compound_head(head, ntails, FOLL_PIN);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(unpin_user_pages);

Reply via email to