> On Feb 23, 2021, at 4:44 AM, Aili Yao <yaoa...@kingsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:01:35 +0800
> Aili Yao <yaoa...@kingsoft.com> wrote:
> 
>> When one page is already hwpoisoned by MCE AO action, processes may not
>> be killed, processes mapping this page may make a syscall include this
>> page and result to trigger a VM_FAULT_HWPOISON fault, as it's in kernel
>> mode it may be fixed by fixup_exception, current code will just return
>> error code to user code.
>> 
>> This is not sufficient, we should send a SIGBUS to the process and log
>> the info to console, as we can't trust the process will handle the error
>> correctly.
>> 
>> Suggested-by: Feng Yang <yangfe...@kingsoft.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aili Yao <yaoa...@kingsoft.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>> 
> Hi luto;
>  Is there any feedback?

At the very least, this needs a clear explanation of why your proposed behavior 
is better than the existing behavior.

> 
> Thanks
> Aili Yao

Reply via email to