On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:09:24AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
> On Monday 11 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Hi Bart,
> > 
> > here's the ide_atapi_pc unification series. It all went pretty smoothly 
> > along
> > the search & replace line. Using driver-specific members in ide_atapi_pc 
> > like
> > idefloppy_callback and idetape_callback is kinda dumb but this approach 
> > seemed
> > the fastest versus unnecessary callback function signature change that will
> > touch stuff all over the place. Besides, ide-tape might be gone soon so that
> > would alleviate the problem.
> 
> applied all four patches, thanks!
> 
> > On a different note, i noticed ide-scsi might also need a cleanup similar 
> > to the
> > other drivers. It is next on my TODO list in case you don't have anything 
> > with a
> > higher prio.
> 
> I was actually hoping that you'll continue unifying ATAPI handling...

yeah, sure. ide-scsi simply will wander down the prio stack pushed by the other
stuff :)

> [ ide-scsi is orphaned and has (probably) unfixable problems (because of 
> having

does this mean it might have a similar to idetape's destiny...?

-- 
Regards/Gruß,
    Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to