Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:42:09PM +0900, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -R /sys/kernel/capability/
/sys/kernel/capability/:
codes  names  version

/sys/kernel/capability/codes:
0  10  12  14  16  18  2   21  23  25  27  29  30  32  4  6  8
1  11  13  15  17  19  20  22  24  26  28  3   31  33  5  7  9

/sys/kernel/capability/names:
cap_audit_control    cap_kill              cap_net_raw     cap_sys_nice
cap_audit_write      cap_lease             cap_setfcap     cap_sys_pacct
cap_chown            cap_linux_immutable   cap_setgid      cap_sys_ptrace
cap_dac_override     cap_mac_admin         cap_setpcap     cap_sys_rawio
cap_dac_read_search  cap_mac_override      cap_setuid      cap_sys_resource
cap_fowner           cap_mknod             cap_sys_admin   cap_sys_time
cap_fsetid           cap_net_admin         cap_sys_boot    cap_sys_tty_config
cap_ipc_lock         cap_net_bind_service  cap_sys_chroot
cap_ipc_owner        cap_net_broadcast     cap_sys_module
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /sys/kernel/capability/codes/20
cap_sys_pacct
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /sys/kernel/capability/names/cap_mknod
27
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
--------------------------------------------------------
Any comment please.

You don't like 1 (one) /proc/capabilities, why?

I have no preference whether a single /proc/capabilities, or the current 
approach.
However, this idea requires a bit more cost to lookup a capability not 
sequencially.

Thank,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to