--- "Ahmed S. Darwish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:26:02PM +0100, Joerg Platte wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when booting linux 2.6.25-rc1 I get the following error:
> >
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000138
> > IP: [<c01aa59e>] smack_netlabel+0x13/0xc8
> > *pde = 00000000
> > Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT
> > Modules linked in: nfsd
> [...]
> > Call Trace:
> > [<c01aacf8>] ? new_inode_smack+0x39/0x3f
> > [<c01aad52>] ? smack_inode_alloc_security+0x16/0x27
> > [<c01a7510>] ? security_inode_alloc+0x19/0x1b
> > [<c01aa665>] ? smack_socket_post_create+0x12/0x18
> > [<c01a7a06>] ? security_socket_post_create+0x16/0x1b
> > [<c02116ce>] ? sock_create_lite+0x44/0x64
> > [<c0211712>] ? kernel_accept+0x24/0x5f
>
> Hi Joerg,
>
> There's a small problem with smack and NFS. A similar report was also
> sent here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/27/85
>
> Could you please check below patch ? I think it should fix your problem.
>
> I've also added similar checks in inode_{get/set}security(). Cheating
> from SELinux post_create_socket(), it does the same. Casey, Thoughts ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This looks like the right sort of thing to do. I would like
to see it in. If you would like Ahmed, please submit with my
Acknowlegement. Thank you for the work on this.
> ---
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 1c11e42..eb04278 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int smack_inode_getsecurity(const struct inode
> *inode,
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> sock = SOCKET_I(ip);
> - if (sock == NULL)
> + if (sock == NULL || sock->sk == NULL)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> ssp = sock->sk->sk_security;
> @@ -1280,10 +1280,12 @@ static void smack_to_secattr(char *smack, struct
> netlbl_lsm_secattr *nlsp)
> */
> static int smack_netlabel(struct sock *sk)
> {
> - struct socket_smack *ssp = sk->sk_security;
> + struct socket_smack *ssp;
> struct netlbl_lsm_secattr secattr;
> int rc = 0;
>
> + BUG_ON(sk == NULL);
> + ssp = sk->sk_security;
> netlbl_secattr_init(&secattr);
> smack_to_secattr(ssp->smk_out, &secattr);
> if (secattr.flags != NETLBL_SECATTR_NONE)
> @@ -1331,7 +1333,7 @@ static int smack_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode,
> const char *name,
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> sock = SOCKET_I(inode);
> - if (sock == NULL)
> + if (sock == NULL || sock->sk == NULL)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> ssp = sock->sk->sk_security;
> @@ -1362,7 +1364,7 @@ static int smack_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode,
> const char *name,
> static int smack_socket_post_create(struct socket *sock, int family,
> int type, int protocol, int kern)
> {
> - if (family != PF_INET)
> + if (family != PF_INET || sock->sk == NULL)
> return 0;
> /*
> * Set the outbound netlbl.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
Casey Schaufler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
