On Wednesday, 13 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 23:18 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > Ouch. I think I know what the problem is.
> >
> > On top of this patch, please apply the appended one and retest.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
> > @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_leave_sleep_state(u8 sl
> > return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
> > }
> >
> > + arg.integer.value = sleep_state;
> > status = acpi_evaluate_object(NULL, METHOD_NAME__WAK, &arg_list, NULL);
> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> > ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "During Method _WAK"));
> Good news. That works perfectly.
Ah, ok. Thanks for testing. :-)
Can you please check if the current mainline with the following patch applied
works on your box?
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c
@@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_leave_sleep_state(u8 sl
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
+ arg.integer.value = sleep_state;
status = acpi_evaluate_object(NULL, METHOD_NAME__WAK, &arg_list, NULL);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "During Method _WAK"));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
