On Feb 12, 2008 4:18 PM, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote: > > > >> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in > >> time? The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29. > >> Or more precisely: which are the "stable" versions I can depend on for > >> a more or less critical server, those that have active security > >> support or receive at least critical bugfixes? I know about the > >> 2.6.2[34].y stable git trees, but I wonder how long will those receive > >> attention (that is, security fixes). Can I find a written policy > >> somewhere? > > > > The answer is at http://kernel.org/ > > Not quite, at least I can't find 2.6.23.y there, even though that > branch seems to be maintained...
2.6.16.x is still maintained (2.6.16.60 was recently released). 2.6.22.x is still maintained but Greg KH is apparently going to be ending his duties on it after the next release or so. There is some confusion as to whether Willy Tarreau will be taking on the 2.6.22.x tree once Greg is done, Willy?: http://lwn.net/Articles/268003/ http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Stable_2.6_Branches 2.6.23.x and 2.6.24.x are obviously quite active for [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
