> On 12/07/12 21:18, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT
> [...]
> > +   struct {
> > +           bool cpu_relax_intercepted;
> > +           bool dy_eligible;
> > +   } ple;
> > +#endif
> [...]
> >     }
> >     vcpu->run = page_address(page);
> > +   vcpu->ple.cpu_relax_intercepted = false;
> > +   vcpu->ple.dy_eligible = false;
> 
> This struct is only defined if CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT is set, 
> but here it
> is always accessed. Will break on !x86 && !s390.

How about moving this struct definition outside the CONFIG.
i.e it would be available by default.
If any arch cares to use vcpu_on_spin(), they would get the benefit by
default. 

This would avoid all the CONFIG magic that we would have to do
otherwise.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to